Comments on: SlashGear Reviews Samsung Impression http://www.slashphone.com/slashgear-reviews-samsung-impression-135422 Worldwide mobile phone news, reviews and wireless innovations Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:34:14 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: abcyesn http://www.slashphone.com/slashgear-reviews-samsung-impression-135422/comment-page-1#comment-6235 abcyesn Fri, 01 May 2009 10:18:18 +0000 http://www.slashphone.com/?p=5422#comment-6235 On the software side, I was a little less impressed, especially with touch accuracy. The moments where the UI was particularly responsive means that the screen hardware itself is ok, but the that the OS is a little wonky. Being a capacitive screen, you shouldn't have to press very hard for the hardware to register your finger. Some times the Impression required a decent amount of contact to really get into action. Other than that, the UI is standard AT&T fare once you get past the TouchWiz UI, but at this point it's starting to look and feel bit dated. share you opinions on http://www.Samsung-Impression.org a cool place for us. On the software side, I was a little less impressed, especially with touch accuracy. The moments where the UI was particularly responsive means that the screen hardware itself is ok, but the that the OS is a little wonky. Being a capacitive screen, you shouldn’t have to press very hard for the hardware to register your finger. Some times the Impression required a decent amount of contact to really get into action. Other than that, the UI is standard AT&T fare once you get past the TouchWiz UI, but at this point it’s starting to look and feel bit dated.

share you opinions on http://www.Samsung-Impression.org a cool place for us.

]]>